The four figures we quote across this site are drawn from StaffCircle customer-reported outcomes and from anonymised StaffCircle platform data. They are averages across customers who measure the relevant metric — not a guarantee, a modelled projection, or a best-case single result. Because organisations start from very different baselines, your own result will differ; the figures are here so you can judge how relevant each one is to your situation.
The average increase in engagement score reported by customers between their baseline survey, taken before rollout, and their most recent survey on StaffCircle. Measured from in-platform engagement and eNPS surveys.
The reduction in administrative hours HR teams spend running a full review cycle after moving off spreadsheets and email, comparing their own before-and-after estimates of time spent scheduling, chasing and collating reviews.
How much easier customers report it is to retain their highest performers once performance, development and succession sit in one place. Self-reported by HR and people leaders, not a turnover calculation.
The average fall in absence days per employee reported by customers who track absence in StaffCircle, comparing the twelve months before rollout with the twelve months after.
We are happy to go through the methodology behind any of these figures in detail, including the sample behind them and what a realistic range looks like for an organisation of your size and sector. Ask us on a demo call and we will walk you through the workings.
Book a demo → or model your own return with the ROI calculator →
Alongside these averages we publish named, individual customer results in our customer case studies, where the organisation has agreed to be identified and to the specific numbers quoted.